Unix Consultants
Главная → ZFS vs WAFL

NetApp's WAFL vs. ZFS feature comparison

 

WAFL

ZFS

Devices

 

 

Raid (0,1,0+1,4,5,6)

Limited to raid-4

Yes1, does not support raid-4

USB storage device support

No

Yes

Include Raw devices2

Limited

Yes

Prevents silent data corruption

No

Yes

 

 

 

On Disk(s) Features

 

 

Copy on Write design

Yes

Yes

Block size

Fixed 4KB

Real time variable 512 byte to 128KB

File system size

10's of gigabytes3 maybe terabytes

Billions of gigabytes

Built in Compression

No

Yes

Built in Encryption

No

Being developed

End to end checksum

No

Yes

Quotas

Yes

Yes

Volume support4

Yes

Yes

NFS

Yes

Yes

NFSv4 ACL support

Yes

Yes

 

 

 

Snapshots

 

 

Unlimited Snapshots

Limited to 2555

Yes

Read/Write Copies (clones)

No

Yes

Snapshots accessible over NFS

Yes

Yes

 

 

 

Administrative Details

 

 

Administrative GUI interface

Yes

Yes

Command Line interface

Yes

Yes

 

 

 

Pricing

Not free

Free

License Type

Commercial

CDDL

Source code available

No

Yes

 

Reference material used.

http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfsadmin_0525.pdf Solaris ZFS Administrative Guide

http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3002.pdf Fle System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance

http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3014.pdf MULTIPROTOCOL DATA ACCESS: NFS, CIFS, AND HTTP

http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3085.pdf The NFS Version 4 Protocol

 

Footnotes

1ZFS implements raidz and raidz2 which are advanced versions of raid-5 and raid-6

2Ability to import raw devices from other NAS, SAN, disk arrays

3Some people have commented that its closer to multiple terabytes, but still waiting for documentation.

4Support raw volumes, for database and apps that need a chunk of storage

53002.pdf System Design for an NFS File Server appliance describes a limit of 255, but other have stated other wise.

Поиск по сайту
Панель управления
Последние новости